What is an ARMS?

ARMS stands for ‘at risk mental state’ and is a term used to describe people who are at a high risk of developing psychosis. The aim of identifying people with ARMS is to provide intervention as early as possible in order to decrease the severity of any psychotic illness that does occur and/or decrease the likelihood of one developing. Early Intervention in Psychosis services are more and more taking on people who have an ARMS. Sometime the terms ‘prodromal psychosis’ or “prodrome” are used interchangeable with ARMS, though there are subtle differences.

Who has an ARMS?
People are deemed to have an at risk mental state if they don’t meet the diagnostic criteria for any psychotic disorder but show the following signs:

  • Unexplained distress and agitation
  • Are within the age range when psychotic symptoms are most likely to occur
  • Recent decline in social functioning (e.g. social isolation)
  • A strong family history of psychosis
  • Very mild or brief (transient) psychotic symptoms
  • Having associated conditions such as Schizotypal Personality Disorder

What can be done to treat people with an ARMS?

  • CBT for psychosis has been shown to be very helpful in decreasing both distress and the number of people going on to develop a psychotic disorder.
  • Integrated therapies or counselling
  • Sometime it’s deemed appropriate to start an antipsychotic medication early on in order to prevent psychosis occurring.

I think ARMS is an interesting development in the world of mental health and it poses a number of questions. Like is it possible to identify risk factors for other disorders? Could we be looking out for early markers for mood and anxiety disorders also? Also, although this approach allows for early detection, something that’s of particular importance with psychosis due to the cognitive decline linked to it, is it right to start people who may never develop psychosis on potent medications like antipsychotics?

I hope this has been helpful. What do you think about ARMS?

5 thoughts on “What is an ARMS?

  1. I have the same concern should you put someone on meds “if” they may need it later? I feel that might tend others to label someone just because they list a med they are on even if never “actually” sowed signs simply potential for a need

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I’d be wary about the meds going to people who don’t yet “need” them, just like I’m wary of children and toddlers on them. But the intervention factor of ARMS is amazing. Love it. A step in the right direction for the rest of the world, that’s for sure. Thanks for sharing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m in agreement about the meds. Perhaps if they’re showing transient psychotic symptoms that they were really distressed by it might be helpful, but otherwise I’d be really wary. No problem, it’s a great progression!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s